Just watched this movie, and found it quite interesting. Pretty good, obviously a good sized budget, good acting and writing. The lead was played by Jason Clarke, who I'm not readily familiar with. But he gave a good performance and, in the right setting and lighting, even looks a fair bit like Senator Ted Kennedy.
The picture above is the real Senator Kennedy, probably taken at Mary Jo Kopechne's funeral. The movie explains its significance. For those of you who don't know, Joseph Kennedy was the patriarch of a very rich and powerful family and was deeply involved in politics. The height of his own career was serving as the US Ambassador to Great Britain.
He and his wife had many children, four of whom were sons. He had very high aspirations for all of them, hoping that one or all of them might eventually become President of the United States. The eldest, Joe Jr., was a bomber pilot who was killed in action in WW2. The next son, John, also served in WW2 as a PT Boat Captain. He survived the war and was a bone fide hero. From there, he went into politics. He became President, but was assassinated late in his first term.
The third brother, Robert, also went into politics. He served as his brother's Attorney General and then won a seat in the US Senate from New York. While running for President himself in 1968, he, too, was assassinated.
This left the fourth, Edward, also known as Ted. While serving as a US Senator from Massachusetts, he went to a party one night on Martha's Vineyard. One of the other people there was Mary Jo Kopechne, a former staffer with his brother, Bobby's Presidential campaign. They left together in his car. There was an accident; the car went off a bridge and turned over, sinking into the water below. He survived, but she didn't.
About the only thing the movie glosses over is their relationship. It's been presumed for decades that they were having an affair. It's also been assumed, and admitted to, that they'd been drinking and that he was quite drunk.
Any movie has to have a central theme; a focal point from which everything else is connected. The central theme of this movie is that Teddy Kennedy was an idiot and an ass. The first part presents him as the dimmest of the four brothers. He became head of the clan by default, not by merit. The rest of it walks us through mistake after screw-up after blunder, most of it driven, not by remorse or concern for Ms. Kophecne or her family, but his own political future.
It also delves into the mechanizations and manipulations behind the scene. By implication, it can be assumed that the same happens around anyone who is that rich and powerful. The film makes it clear that there was a firm plan to run Teddy for President in 1972. This event made that impossible. He finally did run in 1980, trying to wrest the Democratic nomination away from sitting President Jimmy Carter, but found Chappaquiddick hung around his neck like a '67 Oldsmobile.
I find it amazing that Edward Kennedy, the fourth longest serving Senator in US history, is so revered, even in this age of Donald Trump. Trump is rude, crude, and has been unfaithful to three wives. The biggest difference between his personal life and Kennedy's is that Ted was only unfaithful to one wife. And, he drank to excess, while Donald doesn't drink at all, according to legend.
The movie has made me think about the Clintons. Bill is clearly smarter and more careful. And Hillary has his back. When the ballots are cast, do we really care about someone's personality? Or is what they actually do on the job more important? If you hate Donald Trump because of his tweets and Stormy Daniels, don't you also have to hate Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton?
If you still believe that Ted Kennedy was a good man, it's because you agree with his politics. Not, because you would trust him to drive your daughter home after a party.
You want to talk about personalities? Look at Richard Nixon. Very likely, the most awkward and uncomfortable man to ever hold the office of President, certainly in the modern era. He used to practice things to say at parties. Whatever you might want to say about his competence or his honesty, nobody's ever accused him of having an affair. Who would he have one with?
I think I'm well within the mark when I say that the most decent two men to hold the office of President in the last century, regardless of their policies or success/failure ratio, would have to be Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter. This begs the question; is there a difference between good people and great people?
